Title: U.S. Appeals Court Rules Trump’s Broad Steel Tariffs Violated Trade Law: Implications for Trade Policy and the Forex Market
By [Adapted and expanded from the original article by FXStreet Staff]
On August 31, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark ruling declaring that former President Donald Trump’s imposition of global steel tariffs, applied widely under the justification of national security, exceeded the scope of his authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The court determined that applying these tariffs to derivative steel products beyond the initial deadlines was unlawful.
This article breaks down the implications of the ruling, the legal precedent, international response, and the potential economic and foreign exchange (Forex) market effects.
Background: Section 232 and Trump’s Tariff Policy
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the president to impose trade restrictions on imports that are deemed to threaten national security. In 2018, former President Trump invoked this section to apply tariffs of 25% on imported steel and 10% on imported aluminum. This move was part of a broader protectionist policy aimed at revitalizing the American manufacturing industry and reducing trade deficits, particularly with countries like China.
Key aspects of Trump’s tariff initiative:
– Imposed broadly on many countries, including traditional allies such as the European Union, Canada, and Japan.
– Cited national security concerns, arguing that reliance on foreign steel could undermine U.S. defense readiness.
– Later extended to certain downstream derivative products, such as nails, staples, and certain types of wire made from steel.
– Administered inconsistently, with some countries receiving exemptions through negotiations and others retaliating with their own tariffs.
Legal Challenge and Ruling
The appeals court case was prompted by a lawsuit from Transpacific Steel LLC, an importer that was impacted by the tariffs on downstream steel products. They argued that the extension of tariffs exceeded the statutory time limit set by Section 232.
Details of the court ruling:
– The Trade Expansion Act grants the president up to 105 days following a Commerce Department investigation to decide on any action concerning materials that pose national security risks.
– Trump initially followed protocol with the original steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018.
– However, 21 months later, in January 2020, Trump extended tariffs to certain derivative steel and aluminum products.
– The court deemed this extension illegal, ruling that the president does not have open-ended authority to modify or expand the tariffs beyond the statutory deadline.
– The Federal Circuit found the delay between the original tariff imposition and the extension to be unlawful.
The ruling did not question the underlying legal authority of the president to impose tariffs under Section 232, but strictly enforced the timeline and procedural boundaries of such authority.
Implications of the Court Decision
This court decision is expected to have widespread repercussions for U.S. trade policy. Here are the most significant implications:
1. Limitation of Presidential Power in Trade Matters
– The ruling makes it clear that the executive branch cannot continue to expand or alter tariff policies long after the statutory deadlines, even under the guise of national security.
– Future administrations will be constrained by the specific timelines and requirements outlined in trade statutes.
– Encourages a more predictable and transparent use of Section 232, which has been criticized as a loophole for protectionist policies.
2. Legal Precedent for Future Challenges
– Companies negatively affected by similar extensions of tariffs or abrupt trade policy changes now have stronger legal standing to challenge government actions.
– The decision sets a legal precedent that could be applied to policies involving aluminum, auto parts, and other strategic commodities if challenged in court.
3. Potential for Tariff Reversals and Refunds
– Importers like Transpacific Steel may be entitled to refunds for duties paid on the now deemed illegal derivative tariffs.
– Opens the door to significant financial liability for the government in the form of rebates
Read more on USD/CAD trading.